قانون آیین دادرسی مدنی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، آیین دادرسی مدنی

 

7- قانون آیین دادرسی مدنی فرانسه ترجمه حسن محسنی
آراء دادگاهها
1- آراء وحدت رویه
2- آراء هیأت عمومی دیوان عالی کشور
3- نظریات مشورتی اداره حقوقی
شبکه های اینترنتی
1- میرحاجی، کامران، «اعاده دادرسی در حقوق ایران»، پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد، حقوق خصوصی، دانشگاه شیراز، سال 1385، ص29، به نقل از: پژوهشگاه اطلاعات و مدارک ایران (ایران داک) پژوهشگاه اطلاعات و مدارک علمی http://www.irandoc.ir .
2- شمس، عبدالله، تأمین در تأمین خواسته، مجله تحقیقاتی حقوق، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، شماره 17 و 16، پاییز 76 – 74 به نقل از پایگاه مجلات تخصصی نور .www.noormags.com
Abstract:
As a whole with consider to long trend of checking levels until final deciding in courts about the providence of object of judgment compensation of damage preventing of null applications from plaintiff and rapid coming back of damage to defendant is created by law makers. With consider to this application to issue of final order that is composed of wanted providence, short order, null application, strangers application and in other phases getting providence after issue absolute order to final dicision of courts such as getting providence in absent rules, giving legal procedure, supporting providence (wanted providence, short order, perform absent rules, sales unpleasant and wanting future), respectively have highest value and wanted providence for practical use, highest law items in law of civil procedure and in article 108 of mentioned law, it has divided in to two types the cases of issuing wanted providence; first type, the cases that this promise is issuing without getting providence of plaintiff, second type, the cases that the issuing of wanted providence is necessary to giving providence from plaintiff, of course in other applications and the prevented items of getting providence was foreseened by law maker such as, null application and foreigner and in some cases, such as: civil code, accounting cases. Law of criminal procedure. In wanting providence, law maker in (D) paragraph of Article 108 of the Civil Procedure Code (possibly damage) getting providence from plaintiff. Is only (cash) and in 2 additional, article 306 law in performing absent order in addition to getting convinence providence it refers to (valid guarantor) and in other mentioned providence is silent and in other cases such equalitity and time of getting providence has not given any clear method by law maker and, really, assigned this responsibility to lawyers of courts to specialize kind, rate and timing of coming back in unclear cases.
getting providence in phase after issue final rule (performing of absent rule, wanted future, helping in courting, unpleasant of he/she and be unpleasant to court idea) because of object to idea as special, because of stop and delay in performing rule and for compense of damaging person’s damage is certain action. In this study, first we tryed to check the aspects of financial and non financial providence and also we discussed cases in compliance with French law and Iran such getting providence in harm of plaintiff that respectively providence matter 108 in law of civil procedure (wanting providence), providence matter 109 in law of civil procedure (null application providence), providence in harm of guilty, providence for supporting application (wanted providence and short order) and defence (null application and foreigner).
Key words: providence of wish, short order, null application, strangers

Damghan Islamic Azad University
Facuity Of Law
Thesis of master of art Law (M.A) private trend
Subject:
Supporting providence of lawsuit And defence in iran and france laws
Supervisor:
Dr. Ali Mohajeri
Advisor:
Dr: Mohammad javad Baqhizadeh

Post Author : 92

Related Post